AE01749V
A REPORT ON A HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON PORTIONS 1-4 OF ERF 67, THE REMAINDER OF ERF 67, THE REMAINDER OF PORTION 1 OF ERF 25, PORTION 4 OF ERF 25, PORTION 6 OF ERF 25 AND ERF 2868 PRETORIA, CITY OF TSHWANE, GAUTENG PROVINCE
Archaetnos cc was appointed by Delacon Planning to conduct a heritage impact assessment for a proposed development on nine erven, being Portion 1-4 and the Remainder of Erf 67, Portion 4, 6 and the Remainder of Portion 1 of Erf 25, and Erf 2868, Pretoria. In summary:
- Portion 1 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 46 Thabo Sehume Street
- Portion 2 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 256 Struben Street
- Portion 3 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 252 Struben Street
- Portion 4 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 42 Thabo Sehume Street
- The Remainder of Erf 67 Pretoria – 38 Thabo Sehume Street
- Portion 4 of Erf 25 Pretoria – 34 Thabo Sehume Street
- Portion 6 of Erf 25 Pretoria – 28 Thabo Sehume Street
- The Remainder of Portion 1 of Erf 25 Pretoria – 36 Thabo Sehume Street
- Erf 2868 Pretoria – 261 Bloed Street
These erven are in the process of being consolidated and will be known as:
Erf 3609 –
- Portion 4 of Erf 25 Pretoria – 34 Thabo Sehume Street
- Portion 6 of Erf 25 Pretoria – 28 Thabo Sehume Street
- Erf 2868 Pretoria – 261 Bloed Street
Erf 3610 -:
- Portion 1 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 46 Thabo Sehume Street
- Portion 2 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 256 Struben Street
- Portion 3 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 252 Struben Street
- Portion 4 of Erf 67 Pretoria – 42 Thabo Sehume Street
- The Remainder of Erf 67 Pretoria – 38 Thabo Sehume Street
- The Remainder of Portion 1 of Erf 25 Pretoria – 36 Thabo Sehume Street
The developer, City Property, is requesting demolition permits and plan to utilize the area for parking purposes. Due to the size of the development, however, an HIA is necessary.
The buildings on the properties are older than 60 years, but has been adapted over the years to such an extent that it has no inherent heritage importance left. Also nothing else of heritage importance was noted.
The applicable social consultation has also been done, consisting of site notices and newspaper advertisements. No comments were received.
The development may therefore continue. It is recommended that this HIA report be approved by the PHRA-G and that the demolition of the existing buildings on the properties be approved.